Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If humans risk extinction through AI + quantum dominance, perhaps the next “rebi…
ytc_UgzVw4fJe…
G
DEFINITELY NOT A FAN OF AI. Called Walmart for a prescription renewal. Used to b…
ytc_UgzbTRrx4…
G
While I agree with a lot of your points, I do want to say that AI is nothing mor…
ytc_Ugz2ObzXQ…
G
I'd settle for a car that automatically prevents drunk or tired people from driv…
ytc_UgxWP9Y0a…
G
quick lil warning for those who haven't heard do NOT post your art or irl pictur…
ytc_Ugw85Gj1p…
G
Not conscious. A Human Being. Who isbtrapped in their own apartment. Fed by thei…
ytc_Ugyg2VyX5…
G
As an IT-guy, I find AI tools, including AI art generation, extremely fascinatin…
ytc_UgxUiwg3J…
G
AI "artists" are effectively just in a sense, commissioning the AI to make art f…
ytc_UgxYI7GGY…
Comment
There's many angles you can take here. I'll take just one. Understanding existing code takes SIGNIFICANTLY longer than writing code. Even if AI can write the millions of lines of code required for a large-scale system in a single prompt, who's going to validate that the code does what it claims it does and confirm that it doesn't have critical bugs? Writing code is by far the least time consuming part of my job at FAANG.
Our AI-based code completion already fails more than it succeeds. Even if we get to a world where AI can do most of the coding, it'll probably have to look like this:
1. SWEs work to understand requirements and translate that into prompts for AI
2. AI sends SWEs digestible pull requests that we thoroughly review, heavily tweak and approve.
I don't see it going much further than that anytime soon. If John Doe wants to create a new solo project app, I think that'll become a lot easier since scope is small and stakes are low. Maybe we'll need a few less L3s at FAANG+, but I think most of us who work at scale are safe for at least the next 5-10 years.
youtube
AI Jobs
2024-04-09T10:3…
♥ 132
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwG2dA3fhJ3ZXS1NNx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGNqcbjWsAVlJBsyF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyUnEvoJKkJ_mBoa6J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzqMruwVUhBHIXx4B94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwBE7z0iQ4TWZ72AR94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPSWBw--uKVTWdT3x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgymqUTTUJ_PX13WGEp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwd6_PzM6V55pLViap4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzJ1m-J23LNf4CxaTR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxuGinIY6hAf-XBUM94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]