Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Live in the present..it is the ONLY true reality...
Oh...and ignore 90% of your …
ytc_Ugyytz4rg…
G
Waymo was very lucky! The suspect could have been armed and used the car as a sh…
ytc_UgzNtt8Fa…
G
@junkie2100blah blah blah. Ai simps like you think youre so smart. We dont need…
ytr_UgwIYEkHQ…
G
The Marketing Industry is seeing the same parallel right now. Small growth, AI "…
ytc_UgwP5pznP…
G
This video tried to dismiss UBI as not beneficial and failed through a US/Chilea…
ytc_UgzzB9Qor…
G
This interview sounds straight out of a sci fi movie intro based on an AI apocal…
ytc_UgwifLa5g…
G
@joonamyllykoski5953 Thank you for commenting, but I'm pretty sure Combot is mor…
ytr_UgyxetGwm…
G
I think this is wonderful. They claim AI will replace people, processes, entire …
rdc_mi6b599
Comment
Thank you for another great interview! I've been a subscriber for a while and love your AI content. However, I notice nobody discusses the butterfly effect of AI replacing human workers.
Here's the problem: Companies replace employees with AI to increase profits, but then those unemployed people can't afford to buy products and services. This creates a cycle where companies lose customers and profits decline.
We'll end up with a two-tier economy: the wealthy making products only for other wealthy people, while the majority survives on government assistance and can only afford basic necessities from ultra-low-cost providers.
Entertainment, sports, and crafts might thrive, but they'll need to be extremely affordable since most people won't have disposable income for expensive tickets or events.
Nobody seems to be thinking about this economic domino effect when discussing AI's impact on employment.
Just so that you know, I used AI to help make my comment as understandable and clear as possible.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-19T09:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxWQupkSxygvBgqgiF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwmmZOxUCWGXMIgN3R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy81StNLuMMPv9Vsg54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNQ7DOTCgHdEM8Vit4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2xW7-lWMS0nh7A2d4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwF2wwuNj44SJCvJZZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyrT_yFAJqAOB3J2fB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-uAvXVBakckmoccR4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzb8twSFT2F5SlnHNd4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwgJLN4cZa_5-9BjN54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]