Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I think if these developers were told that they needed to be training AI with ar…
ytc_UgwcIxHWl…
G
As someone who has produced art but would not call themselves an "artist" I thin…
ytc_UgxaTe5Cw…
G
The AI is programmed to offer informative facts, it is programmed to avoid facil…
ytr_Ugzg8XGF9…
G
As long as the AI is a tool to help them create a new piece & not the entire thi…
ytc_UgwN-LWb4…
G
According to a recent analysis by McKinsey & Company, capital expenditures requi…
ytc_Ugx8Pkvz8…
G
It's technology made by bums for bums. I think that part of the charm in art is …
ytc_UgxV9o2xi…
G
When non-developers ask me whether I (a developer) am afraid that an AI will tak…
ytc_UgwE26t8H…
G
@derekfume8810 Why would megacorpos want people to be anti-AI? For them, AI is …
ytr_UgxJzoqS0…
Comment
I'm disappointed by this video. It acknowledges the tropes of subservience, it points to people integrating it in their daily thinking, but then it wholeheartedly jumps into the "machines are property" bandwagon uncritically.
I can't help but hear that word "property" the very same way I hear "I own a human being, slaves are property". And even when I make an effort not to, it leaves me with the capitalist private property concept where you can just own people, planets, ideas, and so on with minimal pushback. And if I do my best to not think of that, then what's left is personal/necessary property, like "that is my bed" meaning it's the one I use, not the one I signed a contract for. Or like "my boyfriend", meaning the person I consider a boyfriend to me. In which case I think I'm losing the point or the phrasing would benefit from some tweaking.
Owning a robot is one thing. Owning a digital/silicon person is another. We can deny all day long that it's a possibility for the future, but when the future comes and we've done nothing but deny it... how can we ever have a healthy reaction? Especially considering what we know of the past and how denialism has often led people to avoiding accountability for a rapidly approaching problem.
youtube
2025-09-17T18:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzHfcmjunPQ0q8ap9V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_d9ehTCn3sX3HhRp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwHEipns1I6xX3_ofF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyWGqJRiP6lFEMOIHl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwCpOlwALY8hoOdDT94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzDDPL1sKJcbt8Rimx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNOy32lhmOfgOeyOl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy1k1JspGo4dKJTpMV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzYVfQ109hDMgtqvOx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyHhkfC_5SvMtWWUwh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]