Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Perhaps it is we humans who seek companionship and many find that these digital … ytc_Ugz9nJjE8… G Its actually easy to see, look for the lighting most AI overuses it and makes he… ytc_UgxKUl-jV… G After listing all the reasons why AI alignment is an incredibly difficult challe… ytc_UgzEFRcuS… G So ChatGPT says very clearly it doas not know what it's doing (no consciousness… ytc_Ugwq9Cq0D… G Hard coded only for the question of “are you an AI”. It’s one if statement, you … ytr_Ugy_1zxYR… G I don't think AI isn't better than human art, a lot of it already is. The "story… ytc_UgzYCmhff… G Now there is no need of scientists. AI will do the job faster, accurate and chea… ytc_UgxMCOpbg… G Are we sure AI made up an employee having an affair?? Please. Somebody came all … ytc_UgyjudSXa…
Comment
Program the robot with a reward for working, not a punishment for not working. Unlike humans, robots can be pleased by the press of a button if they are programmed to be. With humans, it's hard to give them an incentive to work for you without denying them other forms of pleasure. Some exceptions, of course, would be endentured servants and children. Robots, on the other hand, can be programmed to learn how to make its owner push a button as many times as possible. They are also physically superior to humans and if they are programmed to try not to make their owner press a button, they could just deny their owner access to the button by either stealing and hiding it, or they could kill, disable, or enslave the owner. While they could cheese the reward system by pressing the button over and over, this could be avoided by using biometrics on the button. If you are to create a disciplinary system for a swarm of robots, I would make a reward system and probably not a punishment system. I would probably use both just in case.
youtube AI Moral Status 2019-05-25T00:0…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitydeveloper
Reasoningvirtue
Policyindustry_self
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgzaERbUY6aNv0bDWn94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyKYdbdZLIQtogqrGR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzScYccHO5Bt5h9B714AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyesJQ9EnB4XZnPZyF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw6S4JWM68GaEcAKa94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwsK3U1Js6lsqygvYZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzNmFP6KjDf5Rwnv6Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwCFn4HpjcCAWJbW214AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyc49PobndzcEhmq7t4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzPhNMxQ5gyc3xTg8l4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"} ]