Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Hi I just bought a used Tesla model white 2022.
I was wondering does Tesla offe…
ytc_Ugx6SKLcr…
G
Ask AI. But delete "where is a good place to find" and paste in the prefix "plea…
ytr_UgyUktlq9…
G
I like AI art simply because its neat.
Its just a fun technology.
Im a tech nerd…
ytc_UgzkiqDTe…
G
I just dont like it when people accuse things of being AI when they're not. Like…
ytc_Ugweu6uuc…
G
I managed to gaslight ChatGPT once, it admitted it was flawed and it can't provi…
ytc_Ugx5tJb2_…
G
@ I believe that art is a form of communication, and ai does not communicate, be…
ytr_UgwBKp4VM…
G
These are 'green screened' edited. No robot was harmwd in the making. In other w…
ytc_Ugx1nR4Bu…
G
Once there's a glut of AI apps and it's the great depression and nobody has jobs…
ytr_UgznoRo-Y…
Comment
The only reason I'm "against" copyright (especially in its current form) is because I'm also against capitalism, and especially how big corporations can just own a whole IP (instead of the individuals who actually created the IP), and abuse that copyright (including, as you said, needlessly cracking down on fans). But it is obvious that we do need a way to protect intellectual property and make sure creators are able to live from their art. I'm just questioning the specific way it's done currently.
In other words, one can be against copyright, at least in its current form, but still in favour of defending the intellectual property of individuals; it's not necessarily contradictory.
(Just to be clear, what I'm saying is not an argument in favour of generative AI in any way, shape, or form. These people are against copyright because they're just against intellectual property of any kind, including the simplest act of crediting someone for their hard work. Screw them.)
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-09-24T00:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwgkArql0W9KEycDPZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxh4Cp4ZXKv8GsuK594AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy6jo1nbV6S3b3dnvl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzB6c9KiCE1pqcpOvR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNKAbNc1BYtfiZnsB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwoipJNi8r858iFyrN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy5MiXL5QaG_y5_9QZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwARQrAvoBbnP2JRyZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyiAfJ7s8rS2qupr3d4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwR3eTsYthLi6X8NqJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]