Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Let me ask something: why people give value to the opinion of famous scientists …
ytc_UgzZd1kEP…
G
What scares me the most is that they're going to create an AI that prompts the g…
ytr_UgzTQhXiJ…
G
For living forever you forget that it's easy to say for someone who has had a pr…
ytc_UgxXO3DcZ…
G
Phones are worse than ring cameras. Facial recognition and finger print scanning…
ytc_UgwzWCtsk…
G
The thing about the AI generators being used to replace artists is not really a …
ytc_UgwXtJ9QO…
G
My dad uses AI to generate spooky stories for a YouTube channel, which is…questi…
ytc_UgzSPQrXr…
G
I think that as a tool it's almost useful, but it takes away from my work. I can…
ytc_UgwJaZbhp…
G
Theist AI : each sentence is grenade
Atheist AI : each sentence is freaking Tsar…
ytc_UgxCrlfKS…
Comment
One of these days I am just going to report this channel for misinformation and start blocking it. For the record, when Computer Animation and 3D animation first came around, it was the same argument, but to get the REAL details out:
1. The surpreme court simply did not hear the case, meaning it did not make a ruling. This meant the previous ruling of the lower court held, which of course stated that you need substantial human involvement or human authorship.
2. AI art CAN be copyritten as long as there was substantial human authorship. It was not the fact that the plantive was wrong, it was the fact the way the plantive argued the case that was wrong
3. It was done without prejudice, meaning it can return to the court if he redoes the argument which happens a lot.
Legal Eagle did a video on this a long time ago and figured the case was going to go this way when it was passed to the court. He stated clearly that more than likely it was going to fail not because it shouldn't be eligable, but because the way the argument was framed.
But here is the issue. Some company desgined a new rocket nozel using AI, and it WAS copyrighted 2 years ago, meaning if he redid his argument he coudl appeal. I doubt he will, but I can bet a big studio problem will eventually.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2026-03-05T23:3…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugxwbsq1CUZ2VRgM-IF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvFgHxyWGI5guKQsd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzMC035gxMGZXBpxOt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2lMfdgellbAz39kB4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyPC1vVTCPK0jGsMZ54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwytTozUG9fjo3oVxV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwLrqQD4AzL1noj3p94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfZKdZU0HsFb2BT4R4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWGi5JT_ngyjZrsb94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugysp4ozPG8ey5gvPK54AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]