Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G In 2000, as a freshman at varsity pursuing an electrical engineering degree, I c… ytc_UgwSjZpw1… G Man thinks he's smart because he "outsmarted" an AI by proclaiming that the guid… ytc_Ugzsw2yIr… G I hope they make a good smart robot name sonny. I think we going to need him to … ytc_Ugz39zdzU… G @jamieparsonage6239 Of course humans would win against robots. Artificial intell… ytr_UgwJ-Ygyq… G People like this need to be put into mental institutions for life! Putting AI ev… ytc_Ugy9pfonG… G Guys, chatgpt gives you codes in like words, ex: L0v3, SW33T etc,gemini still fa… ytc_UgxqVFRlF… G It’s a good thing that I almost always don’t use AI when I get confused, stuck, … ytc_Ugzl9oh-B… G AI “art” still struggles on emotion, it looks stiff and wooden. The slower the a… ytc_Ugyu2zuvR…

Comment

When “reverse socialism” is fine for capital, but UBI is a “handout” to labor... The diagnosis of AI-driven displacement, weak labor power, and massive subsidies for capital (“reverse socialism,” as Jon put it) was hitting on a lot of significant issues. My spidey sense tingled a bit when the guests were praising globalization for reducing extreme global poverty without touching on the exploitation of the Global South. It all came together near the end when they touched on Universal Basic Income (David Autor: “I hate UBI!” wut??), and the limits of the conversation became painfully clear. Redistribution upward is treated as normal, if not the professors’ explicit preference, while redistribution downward is framed as something that would destroy the economy (“millions of people not working would destroy the economy!” lol). What’s the data showing that *everyone* would stop working if their basic needs were met? It’s wild because it was an intelligent discourse, but it was also very self-limiting. These folks seem only capable of operating within the existing paradigm of capitalism and are consciously (and emotionally?) constraining both their imagination and their tolerance for “acceptable” solutions. They can map the consequences of the system in great detail, but never get anywhere near questioning the system itself.

youtube AI Governance 2026-04-22T23:4… ♥ 2

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	contractualist
Policy	regulate
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgynOHfES6ydb7xQKqF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy76R2rzw77QVeOXyR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwgjgQxo3UeFHBvR-d4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyN-aa-ptj766oStN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw1oeuder8y9ic2Sfh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzFGwx-qcusGIcrRu94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw7FqwmZl21ogI3HS54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwFXn2j7ZxjWKUd8Ox4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwDtdiuOyNzpB_088F4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7WvN5uEjtjR3_-Dh4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses