Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Have they put an AI inside a quantum computer yet? I wonder if meshing a sequenc…
ytc_UgwhHHRsv…
G
Hundred percent true the truth is a must never teach a.i deceit never this would…
ytc_UgzcM0D61…
G
OK so really we’re not going to bring up the fact that from what I heard and if …
ytc_UgzIheuyh…
G
Courier services are NOT gonna be replaced by robots that fast. That's idiotic. …
ytc_Ugyi84Rq2…
G
Are humans this bored? There’s not *ENOUGH* horrors? They have to do *THIS*
**g…
ytc_UgwZb8SZC…
G
Heres what you need to do and its gunna sound crazy, but we need to get James Ca…
ytc_UgyO0LsHc…
G
@LorenzoAccorsiThis drone use its built-in AI for guidance and a predefined tar…
ytr_UgzTXo5Un…
G
A.I is man made, all the hype about it being a monster better than humans is jus…
ytc_UgwtKBrHK…
Comment
This was a pointless debate because the phrasing of the resolution was far too loose. The resolution can be synthesized as "is there a an existential threat from AI?" Nothing about time line or when it might happen or degrees of threat. Everyone on the panel stated that there was an existential threat no matter how small. That means if the audience was paying attention they had to vote for the resolution. Only people in the audience who believed there was a definite 100% chance of there being no threat could vote against the resolution. And as no one in there right mind can absolutely claim that, then they could not vote against the resolution. The only way the resolution can be countered is to cease to develop AI further before it becomes AGI or beyond. And as all debaters said there is no good reason to do this right now, then just like all other human endeavours we will continue to innovate ourselves into oblivion. Go humanity - rah, rah rah!
youtube
AI Governance
2024-08-22T11:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyUGgUlM0sPlrHlY5B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXWgnfVXMyJcEoaAN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy19qng_0mU1MAslHN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyqwOM9j68xGe2aCDV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-XTIElT6SaBW8e1p4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLKvjVULwWpr_9zLB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy9wRiF9AtUw3XsMs94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw-YUD7igKvxKOso-Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSIcgpqCmm1DQ2PDJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz7pjPwQp36kXUqWMJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]