Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The breadth of cases available to IR is more than enough that the MIs going to t…
rdc_fcstcbc
G
Digital art sucks too. Try paper and pencil once in a while. Digital art is al…
ytc_Ugxtvx_qH…
G
Zow! Here’s a thought along the line of existentialism. If an AI understood it…
rdc_gqulz53
G
Ai told me it would play Mad Libs with me, but then couldn't! I was mad without …
ytc_UgzIidG4Y…
G
AI isn't evil, it's not a plague. But it can be used maliciously, and it's impor…
ytc_UgxDNMYj8…
G
the art twitter cycle
-Ai art bro with a blue checkmark posts obvious ragebait t…
ytc_Ugxz3xV_k…
G
He is not the godfather of AI, Norbert Wiener was, who coined the term cyberneti…
ytc_Ugyo_4k0D…
G
This guy needs to get off his NYT and CNN algorithm. He's clearly already biased…
ytc_UgyhvYbTk…
Comment
Aren't most of these "tests" really just reflections of what we think a computer/robot/program can't do? We believe computers aren't lazy (can't be) so that should be a test. Anything can be simulated, that's the point. So I believe it comes back to whether we are convinced. Once that happens then it has proven it has a moral impact on us and therefore merits some level of moral consideration.I could say that a test would include the robot's ability to reject parts of it's programming. Because we believe that a computer must do what it's told, that means it can't arbitrarily reject it's code. People can. However, can't this behavior also be faked? Now we have to add, ..reject parts of it's programming, but is not faking it. Now we've tossed the entire premise out, robots are possibly human because they are able to fake intelligence to the point that it no longer seems simulated. There seems to be no "test" that doesn't kill the whole idea in the first place. Hence, therefore (five six) it's all about how it affects you. If you believe, then it is. Ego Credo, Est
youtube
2016-09-03T02:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgijOXwzX5ll4HgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugi_L9Ps1Ao3wngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjE_qt3DXc4AXgCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugg7AdD3sDYLcHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgicXkrK5at_b3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiQFXdWgMS6SXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UghbylCg24GyCXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjxB2hYHk0ringCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UggLyqhud7inwngCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjsMxoDrjmOY3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]