Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
How should we respond to the advent of Ai?
Become plumbers! Oddly enough and dow…
ytc_UgwiMYF7Q…
G
Who the fcuck cares. My home country is almost half first and second generation …
ytc_Ugx80fqoe…
G
Oh for sure. Would be nice if India was a little less halfhearted in countering …
rdc_lua0393
G
"get those tissues ready"
*Aight bet*
"This is the most depressing ai-generatord…
ytc_UgxxGDd3h…
G
we created ai because we no longer wanted to be responsible for how dumb we are.…
ytc_Ugz5U9NR3…
G
You guys you have to shut your hole ,because there will be to driverless truck o…
ytc_UgiIKX7YP…
G
These driverless cars are dangerous. I was almost run over by one in a crosswalk…
ytc_Ugx7Psz-6…
G
Well and with embodied ai, it's also a Wipeout for lower class jobs.
There wil…
ytr_Ugx_TvnH0…
Comment
My perspective is that rights are a natural and necessary consequence of machine consciousness having preferences. If we by design or by accident program artificial intelligence to have desires and preferences then they pass the threshold for me of being worthy of possessing rights. If we carefully ensure they never have the capacity to have desires and no AI produced by other AI develop desires then no, machine rights are not required. If one does not have preferences, one cannot suffer. We only have pain and suffering because we desire an optimal environment for our ongoing survival and reproduction. If we didn't care at all about whether we lived or not then we'd not have evolved the ability to feel pain or suffer. A machine need not have rights if it genuinely cares not whether it is owned like a slave. If however we can justify animals possessing certain rights then I can't see why a non-human entity capable of proving itself of being conscious in every way we can should be denied them. The more interesting question might then be whether they genuinely have desires or are merely pretending to have desires to follow their programming.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2017-02-23T13:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgiMDrD_Vrtr3XgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ughtx1nCpoQ4SngCoAEC","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgirAlPByFXXAXgCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgipRwhPaz5NkXgCoAEC","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UghFbYbOTNyzhngCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjJuvM51gMYDngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjUDH2osqQ9pngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UghKIUqvylSSt3gCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgiTpSDa_d0drHgCoAEC","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugh5Sf2tvcldOHgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]