Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Not at all. Digital art was seen in the exact same way. And just like ai art, ol… ytr_UgyGKVtfG… G Spot on observation. Since the price of the base material has gone done 73% and … rdc_czm51t3 G The US is far ahead of other countries in unmanned drone combat and AI weapons d… rdc_dwux866 G Absolutely! Wisdom truly comes from a combination of knowledge and experience. I… ytr_UgxjgtfwE… G AI isn't a tool. If anything, it's a service. You're requesting something to do … ytc_UgwOHVfr6… G We fr need to start protesting against upgrading ai models like gbt bcuz it trie… ytc_UgwGgz6ar… G About to quit everything and live in the woods. (no ai in the woods, no jobs in … ytc_UgwLnQkRd… G I thought DeepSeelR1 coming out months after GPT1 would help more people realize… rdc_mbvr6qr
Comment
Great video, and a lot to think about when it comes to self driving cars. But the problem here is that the scenario in the video will never happen. Not saying that something won't randomly come into the road while a car is driving, but that the car will never be in a situation where it has to decide whether to crash into something or someone. It has breaks. I know the video said that in this situation, in won't be able to break in time, but again, that will never be the case. The car has sensors that are always on and always analyzing the road and cars around it. It will not be close enough to a truck with an unstable load that breaking in time wouldn't be an option. And the second that load comes undone and becomes a potential hazard, it will have already started slowing down. It's an interesting concept to think about, but I feel like anytime someone comes up with a hypothetical, they forget that these cars don't have the ability to be "surprised" like a human driver would. It doesn't look around and think "everything seems alright so far, maybe I can relax now".
youtube AI Harm Incident 2015-12-08T19:3…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UghSiRcVXA-3FHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugg36gd_wQOCXHgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UggzSEiGsQNLKngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UghidMHZsCybB3gCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgjzNTXzuzIxOngCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UghfmsovrnUJPXgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgjQy7gtc5pA_XgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugio_pXgICTxCXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UggKQCpjXBYZKXgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgggitcG_CbrUXgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"} ]