Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The hypocritical thing is the anti-generative AI people buying Twitter blue. Lik…
ytc_UgwntiLTH…
G
❤ your show Jon! But this one was painful to watch. I have a question for your M…
ytc_UgwmYMPBW…
G
Stick that face on the clumsy ninja kick robot for some full on I,Robot vibes.…
rdc_nepxsgk
G
Keep it up! "AI" is becoming a scourge on the internet and our culture in genera…
ytc_Ugxse5Y4d…
G
The scary thing is we don't know if everyone is a AI and maybe it's a test but t…
ytc_UgwwRkS5v…
G
AI-glazers is a better term. AI-gooners makes me think of people gooning it to A…
rdc_mhz4ir8
G
The only solution is for everyone to become a politician, unless AI takes over t…
ytc_UgzOtd6He…
G
They're using the art style of another person, and since it belongs to that pers…
ytc_UgyOpd5TD…
Comment
This is pretty simple to me.
If we're going to make concious, self aware robots then we have to give them rights - as far as I'm concerned the two are married together. It's irresposible and cruel to give conciousness without rights.
If you're going to make a "being" intelligent, and have thoughts, feelings etc then you can't NOT give them the protections too, because that's basically all "rights" are, protections for self-aware, thinking, feeling beings - human or not is just a technicality imo.
Overall though I think the whole AI thing is a bad idea, there's no real good reason for it (you can create machines to do almost any job with Intelligence short of AI, VI i think it's called?) The only reason for creating AI is because we can, and that's not a good reason, especially in this case given the potential consequences.
You don't have to be particularely intelligent to work out that creating something that is physically stronger, physically more resistant, more efficient and portentially magnitudes more intelligent down the line is a bad idea.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2017-02-23T23:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UggCabrbbmQ0r3gCoAEC","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggWuRG3I2xoMHgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugi0YkzZoj5uFHgCoAEC","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UggdjWFf4dAjwHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgipsfTjRlE4IXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UggLPC21ROMH8ngCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UggLshsEzXkadHgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UghS5aqRWS1YjHgCoAEC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UggB1q9tG8ii23gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Uggpcwm-kQQjQHgCoAEC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"}
]