Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If AI is an Artist then a microwave heating up a meal is a chef, think about it …
ytr_Ugx6Aqvcm…
G
First of all, the fuck?
Hah! No, digital artists actually draw. Ai "artists" jus…
ytc_UgxMY3fIG…
G
5:22 This is comical. CEO's have no idea how their organisation is being operate…
ytc_UgyxbZOye…
G
Facial recognition software is terrifying. If there was a vote on it with inform…
ytc_UgxdAyKYc…
G
Years ago I thought that potentially an intelligent fridge might order 500 bottl…
ytc_UgxFLt8fV…
G
Okay, this isn’t a support for AI art, but I think there’s a misunderstanding in…
ytc_UgymSeo5Y…
G
I just hope the AI in games doesn't remember the war crimes I have committed aga…
rdc_ji69143
G
Driving a car is complex. I drive defensively because other drivers do stupid th…
ytc_UgzHDJI2U…
Comment
This over simplies John Searle's argument and cintributes to a common misunderstanding of it. He says that a digital computer can't be conscious or semantic but he doesn't say that a robot couldn't be. I know you specifically said computer and not robot but you left the impression that he did because you were talking about humanoid robots and never limited that to ones with computer brains. Searle is a reductive physicalist. His lecture at Google demonstrates that. He simply believes that the computers we have today lack a necessary physical mechanism for consciousness and sentience. Adding more RAM, faster processing and more elegant programming won't cut it in his opinion. I think he underestimates the power of emergence but I am not certain. And the philisophical question arises: If we developed a robot that could pass the in person version of the Turring test using a computer "brain" (which even Searle admits the possibility of) would it be morally safer to grant it personhood in case Searle is wrong about emergence?
youtube
2016-08-12T14:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugjm-y_VlSp7gXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugi2wDy0pT2alXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugg7EsEaqcTWyXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjjLumvdyAMHngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UghgbmETgqh03ngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgjL299GEEWmWXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UggfuTD6n0HD9ngCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgipEKhD38TZX3gCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugjvcfv2lTbNwXgCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Uggc9eL6NxhYungCoAEC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]