Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G The scary part is they are or have started mixing this and or Ameca's technology… ytc_Ugz4cIMoe… G This stems from complete ignorance for what tools exist. Midjourney is an amazin… ytr_UgwTzyjNN… G yet the answer is: if they ask for it they care enough about it and are smart en… ytr_UgjOmgeCB… G My question is: Why do 99% of viewers of this video who comment, automatically a… ytc_UgxzYq1cU… G The top 1% make their money from the remaining 99%. Who will buy their iphones, … ytc_Ugx8rOewo… G Absolutely nothing wrong with AI. Here we are again with the whole issue of 'gun… ytc_UgyZj5vo9… G If only we had ChatGpt when I was in school in the '80'ies and '90'ies....… ytc_UgyAtHuZs… G ​​@ShawnLangfordI do agree that we might reach that point for juniors in that ti… ytr_UgxmvsgSj…
Comment
there are multiple ways to look at this: 1. MORE OUTPUT. no change in head count, resume hiring bright college hire + resume firing under performer. AI will increase productivity and quicker launch since other companies will be doing the same. 2. SAME OUTPUT. reduce head count some what and use AI to do the chores. Still require human to sign off on code, doing on-call etc. Each engineer is a tech lead in an area. In fact for redundancies, there should be 2 engineers per area. 3. SAME OUTPUT BETTER QUALITY. same head count but there are more work per work-item. Work quality expectation is near perfect since someone will be using AI to attack your endpoint for exploit.
reddit AI Jobs 1777070764.0 ♥ 12
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policynone
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_oi45nkc","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_oi3sfaw","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"unclear"}, {"id":"rdc_oi3x3sw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_oi477wz","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_oi3lv43","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"} ]