Raw LLM Responses

> What is the origin of the “but think of the children” thing? I think most of this is well-intentioned. It's pretty clear that social media can be harmful to kids (addiction, bullying, sextortion, predators, sometimes driving kids to suicide). And I can understand the desire to keep them away from porn, gambling, gore, etc too. We should do something to improve the situation. Maybe ID verification is the wrong thing to do. Majority of people want SOME solution to online harms to kids: > Common Sense Media today released a new survey revealing that an overwhelming 95% of adults believe children need to be protected from certain online material and features, with pornography, gambling, and online purchases emerging as top concerns. Among other findings, more than six in 10 adults support age verification for social media and online games, while more than half support it for AI, including AI companions. from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/press-releases/adults-overwhelmingly-believe-children-need-age-based-online-protections-common-sense-media-research > The majority of Americans support age verification (79%), but also feel the current age verification process is too easy to get around (85%). from https://allaboutcookies.org/age-verification-survey [no methodology or questions given, just that it was a Pollfish survey in February 2026] > 81% of U.S. adults – versus 46% of teens – favor parental consent for minors to use social media [which IMO implies some age-check to determine who is an adult and who is a minor needing consent] from https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/10/31/81-of-us-adults-versus-46-of-teens-favor-parental-consent-for-minors-to-use-social-media/ > Specifically, 72% of young people and 86% of parents believed more effective age limits would improve online safety for young people. from https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2024/05/23/age-verification-social-media-do-kids-parents-want-it-expert.html >