Raw LLM Responses

I guess it depends what you view attorney client privilege as trying to do. So I’d argue a rational approach would be to apply it to the purpose rather than the occurrence. The purpose appears to me at least to be to facilitate communicating with your attorney and documenting such communications without fear of self incrimination. So if the chat with the AI was meant as an alternative to their retained attorney it’s not really facilitating or documenting communication with an attorney and is therefore not covered. However if you use it to write an email to your attorney or summarize some conversation or transcribe a phone call it’s facilitating that purpose and therefore covered. Also just my personal thoughts on the matter but it seems this would be the comprehensive way to do it and hinge only on what the “purpose” of attorney client privilege is.