Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I’m not buying the notion that this very smart gentleman still developed AI by h…
ytc_UgwJUckVN…
G
On the subject of Ais saying they're conscious, other people say that they are c…
ytc_UgyunZKpf…
G
Yeeeah, no! Any job that includes confidential information, will not be replaced…
ytc_UgyiL8rvc…
G
WHAT is SO DYSTOPIAN about the AI movement ISN'T AI... but PEOPLE! It's the "oli…
ytc_UgyL9IkNa…
G
Neon White
By putting AI in control people are trying to change the laws of ph…
ytr_Ugyb9ADDY…
G
You can tell that one's not even a deep fake. No news station in this nation can…
ytc_UgwtkZyp8…
G
17:31 "alright give me back my hat" *takes hat*
Robot: "you are the first to pe…
ytc_Ugw5trp1c…
G
I guess it all depends on who's programming the AI.
From the curriculum The kid…
ytc_UgxJpXBF0…
Comment
I think a better solution might be requesting Wayback Machine add a complex captcha before each of their site's articles. That would fully block all of the LLM bot scraping, as best as they could do themselves at least.
reddit
Viral AI Reaction
1776748708.0
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_oh8dg9h","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_ohbtm7h","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_ohe5tzd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_ohcv6jn","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_ohe61f2","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"}
]