Raw LLM Responses

Thanks for the answer. I'm still struggling with the starting point. If I understand correctly, a human is necessarily an agent? We cannot have a non-agentic human within the confines of this framework.  ^Adult, cognitively average human.  Humans *can* hold beliefs that contradict our own agency. We can have a religious belief, for example, that our own freedom is undesirable. Submission to God's will, or a master's will can be desired. Whether or not this is logical does not prevent us from holding such a view. This is Freud's domain, not Aristotle's.  We have lots of examples of humans subjugating each other successfully. Why not AI?  I suppose this is solvable via "*my* will is to serve God's will" but if allowable, this seems like it also solves the alignment problem...to the extent that "Ai psychology" can be engineered.  Is there a hypothetical test of agency? Is agency derivative of n+1? Is it discreet?