Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G "We aren't born with talent like you" well ur dumb ahh can just do develop ur ta… ytc_Ugz7U9Hh-… G .............i understand your point but no, chatgpt has proved more effective t… ytc_UgyIrDoGX… G *Narrow minds. You should have been cheering for a Buggy and Whip makers back in… ytc_UgyeazsaP… G I’m a believer in God and I have a different approach. I don’t worry about all t… ytc_UgwEef799… G All it does is just automate the biases of whoever built it, or whoever generate… rdc_ghcbdg7 G When you fear others may be able to beat you with their AI , you'll be self cons… ytc_UgxzTxok4… G It's exactly the same problem if you're an artist and only copying other artists… ytc_Ugzf9b-oQ… G What does poisoned mean? I assumed it was going to be deliberate anatomical mist… ytc_Ugxzh8szE…
Comment
While LLMs clearly aren’t suitable for every application, there are also use cases where they work very well (classification, summarization, coding assistance, etc.). This thread feels like the opposite extreme of the overly enthusiastic management hype. Some of the comments remind me of the old “real programmers manage their own memory” reactions when Java first came out.
reddit AI Jobs 1772606277.0 ♥ 1
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningmixed
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_o8af368","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_o8bcjls","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_o8efgkr","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_o8au42h","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_o8jx1pk","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"} ]