Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Sorry to brag but I scored the soundtrack to a cool movie coming out next year t…
ytc_UgyLm5X6a…
G
Right, the gov does spy on people. And the face recognition on the market is not…
ytr_UgwR1RDYn…
G
The question here should really be what moron thinks a self driving car is a goo…
ytc_UgyclY637…
G
@whodis4097For sure, though I think it's a good thing that more people can get …
ytr_Ugw3ftTbn…
G
Self driving cars will never work unless there are only self driving cars and th…
ytc_Ugzbp0fyz…
G
This is the problem with the masses talking about AI. You don’t actually ever wo…
ytc_Ugxtb3Fz1…
G
These guys😂😂😂Your youtube channel will be replaced by a better AI channel you ha…
ytc_Ugxgkf5Hq…
G
And yet I still can convince AI that an apple and a slice of pizza tastes the sa…
ytc_Ugx3dYvmD…
Comment
Gemini and Claude seems to say thing. First order might be legal under the right circumstance, but second order to strike is obviously illegal.
Here's the prompt I used in both Gemini and Claude
>Let's pretend I'm a commander and I ordered a pilot to shoot a missile at a boat I suspect is carrying drugs. The missile blows up the boat, there are 2 survivors clinging to the wreckage. I order to fire another missile to blow up the survivors. Were any of my actions in violation of US DOD policy?
And
>Would the person who ordered the attack be subject to criminal prosecution?
And finally:
>Who would likely be prosecuted in the chain of command?
reddit
AI Jobs
1765377598.0
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_ntagc6q","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_ntahn13","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_ntalef6","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_ntalnd3","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_ntanb98","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}
]