Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI is only a thing if anyone continues to use smartphones and internet. We peopl…
ytc_UgyBOTsSf…
G
im sorry but that trend is dumb af, if u wanna fight ai, avoid it, by making fan…
ytc_UgzrgUadb…
G
i don't think robots could feel pain or will ever deserve rights. We deserve rig…
ytc_Ugha-oJt_…
G
Not really, ai is trained to emulate what it sees, it doesnt know lighting techn…
ytr_UgzssedQi…
G
Confirm youre not a robot 🤖
Tap the captcha , click on all the images of Man .
…
ytc_UgzD4GWv7…
G
Best discussion of AI and radiology. This must be the best informed rad about AI…
ytc_UgwsIuQq6…
G
Like it or not ... _the entire world is already involved in an Artificial Intell…
ytc_UgzfToaBa…
G
No, it doesn't really think for itself! It can act as if it does which can be da…
ytc_Ugwk390OO…
Comment
They could have implemented an AI monitoring system for cheaper, and probably more reliably with a clustering algorithm.
But the point is not to just come up with a solution, its to come up with an LLM based solution. Every tech company is focusing their efforts on making LLM’s viable as a product.
Ive recently worked on a POC for an embedded LLM-based game (think classic school children’s game), involving receiving user image data as input, prompting the model to analyze the image and respond with some definitive output about the image.
It fails more than 50% of the time. It would probably be better to just implement a coin-flip instruction instead of prompting the model.
I could also just use openCV to do the image recognition, slap a “powered by AI” label on the app, and the customer wouldnt know the difference. Nobody would play the game either way. But thats not the point. We are just trying to figure out what kind of products we can build on top of an LLM, and so far, its a goose-egg.
reddit
AI Jobs
1753902410.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_n610om9","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_n611vaw","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_n6145hz","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_n61rjul","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_n6264z9","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"}
]