Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G I don't see waiter/bartenders being automated. Majority of restaurants are famil… ytc_Ugx8aRvZV… G Most of the testing for FSD is in warm weather climates. In NZ we frequently ge… ytc_UgyjU9ju_… G I dont know if you are joking, but I am interested in a serious fashion about th… rdc_oi090qg G Who ever asked for a driverless car? Anyone? Not me. Technology: just because we… ytc_Ugyet7sRk… G The man just spitting facts, proud of his work, that's all. Any of you sorry bit… ytc_UgxUiPVDc… G 🤣😂😅😁 Brilliant, so fun and interesting 👍 Love the chatGpt, and that's not litera… ytc_UgwauBWXl… G This is a strange mischaracterization of the broader concept. The flaw is in exp… ytc_UgzdrtcwA… G This is genuinely so funny, all i can think of is that spaghetti meme where the … ytc_UgyfvvXUO…
Comment
I doubt that much of this has made it into the actual training data of the models. Since the article is mentioning testing "chat bots", most of their results are probably from the models doing a web search and paraphrasing, with the providers not doing much to prevent misinformation. Think of that what you will.
reddit AI Harm Incident 1743171346.0 ♥ 17
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policyliability
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_mk6dlbs","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_mk6rnxp","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"rdc_mk6x9fb","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_mkba3m2","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_mk7mhoh","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"} ]