Raw LLM Responses

« I like to read a lot about neuroscience » I 100% believe you, but then why do you claim consciousness is just a few chemicals and differences in electrical potential? Because we don’t know that. We don’t know what exactly causes consciousness and how it works. We can barely define it. You’re just throwing one of the theories, yes it is seen as a likely one but it is just a theory - not exactly tested enough nor proven. It’s really just what this post describes. A redefinition of science. If I want to stretch definitions, choose those I like and ignore those I don’t, then carefully pick examples for my theory, I could claim a calculator is sentient, and a human isn’t. Funny how it works. I’m kinda tired of all those posts claiming that maybe humans are simply beings while AIs are incredibly complex while an AI struggles to do 1+1 and will hallucinate the most wild stuff ever on occasion. AIs are impressive, trying to make us look like idiots so they look perfect is extremely disingenuous at best.