Raw LLM Responses

I wonder if the SCOTUS case [Skyywalker v. Acuff-Rose](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc.) would be relevant. That established that commercial use wasn't an automatic disqualifier for fair-use, albeit in the context of parody. My uneducated guess is that precedent will be used to try and shift the focus away from whether or not OpenAI is making money and instead whether or not the news organization is losing money. In that case, I suspect they've got a good case for the use in training data based on the precedent of AI developers paying licensing fees for other training data. However, they'd have a weaker case for the AI using their content at run-time via things like ChatGPT's Bing integration, as that'd be closer to how existing non-AI services like search engines and social media have generally used the content without paying (though there have been exceptions).