Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
What are we gonna do if robots ask for their rights? UNPLUG THE FUCKER! We have …
ytc_UgjTGWk9P…
G
Let’s see how this video ages in the next 5 years. Genuinely curious!
Half a ye…
ytc_UgxlgH_a5…
G
Following on from this you should all watch the video "it begins:and Ai literall…
ytc_UgzHwB4Jy…
G
The thing about the “classism” argument not having people to look over work is t…
ytc_UgwH-9sGZ…
G
"Ai artists are artists whether you like it or not" not a statement I agree with…
ytr_UgwKyz16q…
G
What he is saying is he could program AI to be what what ever what he wants to b…
ytc_UgxDVOzhh…
G
I really hope the bubble burst soon, the longer it builds the worst the fall. An…
ytc_UgyvJZAnk…
G
@zacbuyco3429 Citation needed, peridot, IMO
For e xample, it seems foolish to s…
ytr_UgyRKFeec…
Comment
My company never picked it up. No big deal. I was doing fine without it. Didn’t they say people were putting proprietary stuff into ChatGPT which was then getting stolen?
reddit
AI Jobs
1716386659.0
♥ 339
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_l566yd0","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_l56bawl","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_l58x0fz","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_l56yo53","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_l57mn3w","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]