Raw LLM Responses

Ignorant statement showing how a rich guy is out of touch with what labor is. Unless perhaps he was thinking AI+Robotics and long term being 40+ years, which is not likely. According to BLS, here are the top labor jobs: [https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/area\_emp\_chart/area\_emp\_chart.htm](https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/area_emp_chart/area_emp_chart.htm) These jobs are: * Retail Salespersons * Home Health and Personal Care Aids * General and Operations Managers * Fast Food and Counter Workers * Cashiers * Registered Nurses * Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand * Customer Service Representatives * Stockers and Order Fillers * Office Clerks, General ​ How many of those can even a super intelligent actual artificial intelligence actually replace? Maybe some management, maybe some customer service, perhaps some office clerks, but all the rest is fine. AI isn't going to replace hardly anything, a couple million jobs, tops, out of over 25M. Now, AI will help robots work better, and robots may replace some of those jobs, but we are decades out from having robots acting as nurses or selling stuff as retail, maybe even a generation away. AI should be treated as an "artificial assistant", not an intelligence, as it really isn't smart. All it can do is extrapolate from known data. We are still a long way off from having "AI" replace a guy putting cans of peas in the isle of a Grocery store. ​ Robots will eventually probably replace all of those jobs, or at least most, but I do not see that happening for a very long time. Robots are still very expensive, and people are not typically very happy dealing with them. They are getting there, and we see them stocking shelves and filling orders already in large scale, but it'll be a while before they really make a dent in the job market. This sounds like hype for a product he is selling more than anything else.