Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I am not a lawyer, not even close. But, AI seems like a good way to do your leg…
ytc_UgzcXgLIg…
G
he says finds a job that AI can't do ....what is there that AI cant or wont be a…
ytc_UgzqbMluy…
G
They really just laying people off because they plan on replacing them with over…
ytc_UgxM9tUrZ…
G
For me AI is very limited. I cannot get it to code for me because its inefficien…
ytc_UgybNkZYW…
G
yeah so if I create a robot to kill someone by its own will he would be the kill…
rdc_dy4c8lm
G
This is an amazing video, and I agree with literally everything you say. HOWEVER…
ytc_UgyUJHRTu…
G
If he’s an artist for using Ai, I’m a programmer because I touched a controller …
ytc_Ugxg6la1G…
G
some ai can be good, like the ai used in algorithms, cleaning robots, motion sen…
ytc_UgxuWJBc3…
Comment
The burden of proof is not yours. It’s always on the accuser. Taking a single phrase and using that as evidence is ridiculous. They didn’t even manage to provide any evidence at all to accuse you of anything. You should simply state that you did not use ChatGPT to write your work and that they’re mistaken. “Similar phrasing because that’s all I can do my job is harder now yo” is NOT evidence.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1704606907.0
♥ 311
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_kgqc6es","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_kgpfbmb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_kgpf363","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_kgp2u2p","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_kgp8myh","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]