Raw LLM Responses

So an AI CEO working for shareholders. I scoffed at the premise of the title. The work of a CEO is complicated, and not easily relegated to a computer program. Foremost the (social) networking aspect would be currently impossible to substitute. The inclusion of shareholders makes it a much more believable dystopia. Parasitic venture capitalists already use algorithms (though not explicitly called "algorithms") in their decisions to maximize their own profits and extract value in all senses of the word out of the corporations they own. They already shift the blame to the "best practices" *somehow* not letting enterprises survive their decision making. An AI CEO would cement that mindset. They are doing the proven mathematically best for the corporation (but let's forget they optimize for shareholder profit). Not having to pay the CEO to extract even more money sounds like a good idea, and the best part is you can't point to anyone making a mistake. The CEO is an algorithm, and the shareholders provide flawlessly benevolent money. There is the caveat there has to be some accepted scapegoat; the data was not complete enough, the program version wasn't up-to-date, there was some anomaly with the situation nobody could have predicted. A big function of CEOs is being scapegoats, if we're talking about shareholder-controlled corporations.