Raw LLM Responses

I can say 100% that I've told people about some code function or software project that either doesn't exist or was incorrect. Sometimes I have a brain melt and make all sorts of stupid mistakes when coding. It's correct that people should validate gpt-4 output, but that's true of anything on stack overflow etc. What's important to realize is that the code it presents is a single-shot first draft with no testing. If you can find a developer that can do that at even 1/10 the speed then you should hire them on the spot. Again, I agree with the main post that the llms present hallucinations in very convincing ways, and so nothing it says should be trusted without verification - or accept the risks and go for it.