Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Doomers are exhausting. We are close to having the means of exponentially improv…
ytr_Ugyl9Tj_W…
G
imo if you make digital music, the computer makes it with your guidance (which i…
ytr_Ugyc2Uxa8…
G
That first clip definitely looked like AI
Or a really cheap animation studio, th…
ytc_UgzHL3Oyp…
G
A large problem is our low speed limits. Speed limits are based around generati…
rdc_crxsnsz
G
If you write them in Microsoft Word and then run them through a LLM before ever …
rdc_o9cybad
G
Poor guy man. I hope he takes this as a stepping stone and jump back up. Good lu…
ytc_Ugydh7MZt…
G
I've noticed the characters in these videos constantly conclude their talk with …
rdc_mucd90a
G
I’m glad to see the pig detection algorithm is functional but they gotta work on…
ytc_UgwAgdZpW…
Comment
You could say there's a level of intentionality in the same sense that there's a level of intentionality in autocomplete for texting, as that is essentially what ChatGPT is doing. The more information the autocomplete has to work with, the more narrow its possibility space for continuing the sentence.
reddit
AI Governance
1676263473.0
♥ 15
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"rdc_j8axiwc","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_j8c2npe","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_j8b7q20","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_j8b96ba","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_j8auzxm","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"})