Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
25:45 No way is bro asking what a chatbot is halfway through the discussion. Was…
ytc_UgzVvGtiP…
G
I’m skeptical. I think regular people would get enshittified AI, you’d have to p…
rdc_ohk6h4u
G
Automation and robotics will necessarily replace human workers due to the curren…
ytc_UgwEUBOsX…
G
Last week I phoned um the mail delivery service to find out where my new mobile …
ytc_UgwSXTPDr…
G
Is China’s AI strategy more about efficiency than dominance—and does that win?
…
ytc_UgymQV48g…
G
Sir we should blame all. like chatgpt ai should also be preventing this kind of…
ytc_Ugzam07zE…
G
I just can't! This AI BS is going to bring us to the greatest heights of over co…
ytc_Ugzd1SAXG…
G
AI cant draw my character but when ı said her draw me
İt drew me as a wolf…
ytc_UgzGCzuwh…
Comment
Very well written and interesting post! I'm sure a lot of us here are thinking along the same lines. Although I'd like to talk about all of them, I'm gonna focus on what I know the best:
"8. The creative space, which I hoped was going to be the last refuge of humanity, was actually the first to go - I had always hoped that creative pursuits, such as art and music, would be the last things to go. That even if jobs disappear we could each delve into the creative, and find self worth there. But instead, they were the first to go, at least digitally. I can see some physical manifestations going to AI as well."
Short answer: **the arts will never leave**.
We are human beings, and we have a natural need to be creative. We have a need to make art, because making art is expressing ourselves, our emotions, our thoughts, our lives. The creative space will never leave. Will there be a place for AI art and music? Yes, of course. Will it dominate the creative space? Maybe. But will it completely take over? Not a chance.
The one thing that we have to remember about art is that we will create it no matter what. Artists love the process, the pursuit, and the adventure. We live our art, it isn't simply a product that we produce. The finished piece is the result of the adventure, it's not always the end goal. Also, artists are perpetually pushing for what is new, because they are always finding new ways to express themselves, and I doubt AI could do that in a way that exactly mirrors humans' ability.
Easy argument: This idea has happened before when cameras became popular. People were saying "Painting is going to die because we have something better". Guess what? Painting didn't die, it actually went through a resurgence. People still paint to this day.
I'm not going to cite a source because you can just use ChatGPT to check. ;)
reddit
AI Moral Status
1674104281.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"rdc_j4wv2ba","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_j4xqwiw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_j4x5nvo","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_j4xb0fb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_j4ysl0j","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}]