Raw LLM Responses

u/JonCBK has given a pretty good, succinct, summation of my point but let me elaborate. In 50 years or so, it is easy to imagine that self-driving cars will be pretty ubiquitous and have been for a number of years. By that point the issue of whether these cars should be allowed to let a person violate a restraining order against him. At that point I don't think it will possible to argue against the fact that you only permission to use the vehicle as you please and whenever you travel, you only do so because google lets you. Of course, the idea will expand. Including more scenarios where the company or the government believes that it is better that you not be allowed to travel to a given destination. edit: I think a lot of this can be prevented making it impossible to ban driver operated vehicle. Perhaps an amendment saying, "Section 1, Congress shall make no law that prohibits the driving of licensed vehicles. Section 2; no State shall prohibit the driving of safe automotives by reasonably competent drivers."