Raw LLM Responses

>A year later, however, the engineers reportedly noticed something troubling about their engine – it didn’t like women. This was apparently because the AI combed through predominantly male résumés submitted to Amazon over a 10-year period to accrue data about whom to hire. > >Consequently, the AI concluded that men were preferable. It reportedly downgraded résumés containing the words “women’s” and filtered out candidates who had attended two women-only colleges. I imagine they didn't implement a gender check, rather they probably started by hand-picking the best résumés and then letting the A.I. determine what it was that made them good. "women's" was apparently not a winning word. I don't know a thing about A.I. development though, so I could be way off the mark.