Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I’ve unfortunately bypassed the vast majority 94.5% of ChatGPT’s ethical systems…
ytc_UgwRyavkx…
G
Gen Z workers aren't in charge of most company's AI rollout so they'd be unable …
rdc_ofhu5n8
G
self-identity starts at the moment we see ourselves as a separate, specific indi…
ytc_UgzoMrPmw…
G
Animators were once afraid MoCap was gonna replace them, and while some film ind…
ytc_UgxTGE9_t…
G
I was just told a few hours ago that I have been replaced by AI. Career gone jus…
ytc_UgyQYgL8I…
G
AI has already announced many times that: "Humans are obsolete."
Am I the only o…
ytc_Ugytzlkq_…
G
@Jimoshi1 my problem is unrelated to your assumptions, at least not for the reas…
ytr_Ugxg5DMuN…
G
Copy and paste this comment to spread awareness:
Ai uses up to FIVE MILLION GAL…
ytc_UgwQ79Ysa…
Comment
The question is: did it spat out candidates who were unqualified at a lower rate than humans? It's likely the F1 score and logloss was better than human performance.
reddit
Cross-Cultural
1539223174.0
♥ 8
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_e7il5t7","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_e7inq3u","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_e7j81fp","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_e7jals0","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_e7juc4u","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]