Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G If the government weren't in on it, the market economy would proportionally decr… ytc_UgzsKHNfG… G Useless policy. Soon enough. YouTube would get replaced by traditional channel, … ytc_UgyXShGJS… G @kolliwanne964 Then… commission someone and don’t give a bullshit response to th… ytr_UgxjUgctP… G AI comes with risks, biggest one probably coming from the militaries application… ytc_UgzUA4OEh… G 14:28 As a disabled artist (mainly severe nerve damage that makes my right arm f… ytc_UgxRIIDAP… G WHY ???? WHYYYYY ??? WHY THE BUILT THIS SHHHH ....MAKE MONEY AND THEN WARNS US..… ytc_Ugx97S5-x… G I don't want to be doomeric maybe I do, but recently a book author tried to sue … ytc_UgxBM3ry0… G You do realize how offensive that comparison is, right? Comparing a group of ma… ytr_UgwmaBYnq…
Comment
actually, since the problem is *very* highly biased to seeing negative examples, and you can go back to the old fashioned method of checking if it's the right person if it fails, it's probably better to skew towards false positives than false negatives. Because a classifier is *going* to have to make that trade-off.
reddit AI Harm Incident 1530824453.0 ♥ 2
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:13:13.233606
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_e1tvb3c","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_e1ul7av","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_e1ur9l2","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_e1uxf04","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_e27epfp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]