Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
As the Pink Floyd song goes: "Welcome... to... the machine." Certainly we will n…
7464677238194…
in
If task is vague, they complete the wrong thing fast. The hands need guardrails.…
7464694646338…
in
“Built right and deployed responsibly”...it remains to be seen how responsibly c…
7464053368362…
in
Very relevant perspective — AI creates the most value when it augments skilled p…
7464951806138…
in
#NewYorkState Capitol: #EnergyEfficient #HumanCentered #AI-#Quantum #Innovations…
7466516181236…
in
I converged on the community of Ai governance from a theory I formulated and I d…
7466481519231…
in
Frankly speaking I'm really frustrated by the amount of AI-generated content on …
7449877811156…
in
Pascal BORNET The real inflection point is governance of incentives. AI is alrea…
7464949450113…
Comment
Evan Hunter Evan the nuclear analogy lands hard because it's exact. We didn't let private companies self-regulate fissile material and call it innovation. The distinction that made nuclear different was that governments understood the catastrophic downside before widespread deployment — not after. The governance infrastructure preceded the technology at scale. AI governance is running in reverse. The technology is deployed at scale while the governance infrastructure is still being argued about in congressional hearings. Your point about C-suite and board accountability preceding vendor accountability is right — the problem is most boards don't yet have the technical literacy to ask the right questions. Which creates a gap that vendors fill with their own risk framing. The Vatican moment matters because it's one of the architects saying publicly that the internal accountability structure is insufficient. That's the signal boards should be acting on right now.
LinkedIn
AI Safety & Risk
Healthcare IT & Blockchain Strategist | AI × He…
2026-05-28T11:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | accountability |
| Secondary value | safety |
| Alignment target | society |
| Stance | demanding |
| Emotion | approval |
| Value justification | The speaker emphasizes the need for outside scrutiny and governance infrastructure to prevent catastrophic downsides, highlighting the importance of accountability in AI development. |
| Target justification | The speaker discusses the impact of AI governance on society as a whole, referencing the need for boards and governments to take action to ensure accountability and safety. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:27:19Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "accountability",
"value_secondary": "safety",
"target": "society",
"stance": "demanding",
"emotion": "approval",
"value_justification": "The speaker emphasizes the need for outside scrutiny and governance infrastructure to prevent catastrophic downsides, highlighting the importance of accountability in AI development.",
"target_justification": "The speaker discusses the impact of AI governance on society as a whole, referencing the need for boards and governments to take action to ensure accountability and safety."
}
```