Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

in As the Pink Floyd song goes: "Welcome... to... the machine." Certainly we will n… 7464677238194… in Exciting developments, especially around multimodal reasoning, scientific accele… 7463409372203… in This is such an important conversation, Matthew Kilkenny! AI is advancing quickl… 7465142385119… in Matthew Kilkenny ,I am not looking at this through a religious lens, but through… 7466324223091… in Your point about token based pricing turning AI into a costly tool highlights wh… 7465425265876… in I posted about this in the marketing context. You have to be good at your craft … 7469042145849… in The deeper issue for me is that there is still a long distance between an LLM an… 7463913377627… in ATTENTION: @Demis Hassabis & the Google DeepMind Safety Architecture Team Consid… 7465483074831…

Comment

Sanders asks the right question — and immediately retreats from it. "Who decides" is only useful if you follow it through. The moment you do, you hit a harder problem: the institutions through which "we" might decide are already being restructured by the same actors building the stack. So the question isn't just who benefits — it's who retains the capacity to resist when they don't. That's not a distribution problem. It's a subjecthood problem. And social-democratic toolkits — redistribution, regulation, fairer outcomes — were designed for a world where power relations were stable enough to be taken as given. That world is ending faster than the toolkit is adapting. The real question being decided right now, without most people noticing: not what AI can do, but which actors will permanently lose the structural capacity to push back. Once that's gone, the conversation about "fairer outcomes" becomes academic.

LinkedIn AI Policy & Regulation Infrastructure Resilience Analyst | Ukraine Con… 2026-05-28T07:2…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Primary value	economic_equity
Secondary value	none
Alignment target	vulnerable_groups
Stance	critical
Emotion	fear
Value justification	The comment emphasizes the issue of who benefits from AI and the concentration of value in few hands, highlighting the need for fair distribution of AI's economic gains.
Target justification	The comment expresses concern for the capacity of certain actors, likely vulnerable groups, to resist or push back against the powerful actors building AI systems, implying a focus on the wellbeing of these groups.
Coded at	2026-06-11T08:26:54Z

Raw LLM Response

```
{
  "value_primary": "economic_equity",
  "value_secondary": "none",
  "target": "vulnerable_groups",
  "stance": "critical",
  "emotion": "fear",
  "value_justification": "The comment emphasizes the issue of who benefits from AI and the concentration of value in few hands, highlighting the need for fair distribution of AI's economic gains.",
  "target_justification": "The comment expresses concern for the capacity of certain actors, likely vulnerable groups, to resist or push back against the powerful actors building AI systems, implying a focus on the wellbeing of these groups."
}
```

Raw LLM Responses