Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
If Anthropic engineers vibe code and their product is getting insane hype, you k…
7468670127421…
in
I am afraid it is a little too late. It is naive to think we can go back and sta…
7464911707312…
in
Finally, the staged approach here highlights an important principle: AI adoption…
7464632516239…
in
AI isn’t the threat. The people who own it are. The tech isn’t deciding anything…
7469203914278…
in
All the comments below seem to support Bernie's point - AI being controlled by a…
7465345727121…
in
If task is vague, they complete the wrong thing fast. The hands need guardrails.…
7464694646338…
in
Nonsense. The “AI agents demanded collective bargaining rights” narrative is mos…
7463722205676…
in
The path is inverted. Ai should be disarming. Relational AI uplifts humanity to …
7464976807776…
Comment
The uncomfortable question may be even deeper: who is really directing AI right now? We can point to founders, investors, governments and big tech leaders, and they clearly influence the direction through capital, infrastructure, regulation and talent. But as AI systems become more capable, the question is not only whether humans can manipulate AI. It is also whether AI will start shaping human decisions, incentives and institutions in ways we don’t fully understand yet. So yes, ownership and governance matter. But maybe the real debate is not only “who benefits from AI?” It is also: who, or what, will ultimately be steering the system?
LinkedIn
AI Policy & Regulation
Global Growth & Transformation Leader | Busines…
2026-05-26T20:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | accountability |
| Secondary value | none |
| Alignment target | humanity |
| Stance | skeptical |
| Emotion | fear |
| Value justification | The speaker emphasizes the need to understand who is directing AI and the potential for AI to shape human decisions, indicating a concern for accountability in AI development and deployment. |
| Target justification | The speaker's questions about the direction and governance of AI imply a concern for the impact on humanity as a whole, rather than a specific group or individual. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:19:05Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "accountability",
"value_secondary": "none",
"target": "humanity",
"stance": "skeptical",
"emotion": "fear",
"value_justification": "The speaker emphasizes the need to understand who is directing AI and the potential for AI to shape human decisions, indicating a concern for accountability in AI development and deployment.",
"target_justification": "The speaker's questions about the direction and governance of AI imply a concern for the impact on humanity as a whole, rather than a specific group or individual."
}
```