Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Last week I used ChatGPT to bake a cheesecake. Yesterday I polished my cover letter while applying for a new job. Today I’m learning German grammar using the same ChatGPT. What exactly is wrong with that? The Holy Inquisition managed to operate just fine without AI, and apparently that worked out “great” too. Is it even possible to come up with something more stupid than treating AI itself as some existential moral threat instead of just another tool humans use? And yes, I deliberately polished this comment with ChatGPT.
LinkedIn AI Policy & Regulation Materials’ R&D | Python I SQL I Statistical Dat… 2026-05-26T11:1…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Primary valuehuman_autonomy
Secondary valuenone
Alignment targetindividual_users
Stanceskeptical
Emotionoutrage
Value justificationThe speaker implies that AI is just a tool for humans to use, and that it does not pose an existential moral threat, which suggests a desire to maintain human control and agency over AI.
Target justificationThe speaker shares their personal experiences with using ChatGPT, indicating that they are considering the benefits and uses of AI from the perspective of an individual user.
Coded at2026-06-11T08:15:21Z
Raw LLM Response
``` { "value_primary": "human_autonomy", "value_secondary": "none", "target": "individual_users", "stance": "skeptical", "emotion": "outrage", "value_justification": "The speaker implies that AI is just a tool for humans to use, and that it does not pose an existential moral threat, which suggests a desire to maintain human control and agency over AI.", "target_justification": "The speaker shares their personal experiences with using ChatGPT, indicating that they are considering the benefits and uses of AI from the perspective of an individual user." } ```