Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
We have to find alternative ways to ensure the use of AI is limited to copiloting and not replacing the writing process. An approach, maybe, is to ask for regular review chapter by chapter and incorporating this in the assessment grading. Also a viva is a must and potentially has to carry a higher weighting where students unable to defend what they've written will give them out as potentially using AI irresponsibly. But it will take a lot of honest admission and "thinking out of box" and do away with some academic orthodoxy.
LinkedIn AI Research & Models Development Economist | Fintech & Green Finance… 2026-05-24T16:2…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Primary valuehuman_autonomy
Secondary valueaccountability
Alignment targetindividual_users
Stancedemanding
Emotionapproval
Value justificationThe speaker wants to limit AI's role to 'copiloting' and ensure students are in control of the writing process, emphasizing human autonomy.
Target justificationThe target of the alignment is individual users, specifically students, as the speaker discusses ways to assess and ensure their honest work.
Coded at2026-06-11T08:04:40Z
Raw LLM Response
``` { "value_primary": "human_autonomy", "value_secondary": "accountability", "target": "individual_users", "stance": "demanding", "emotion": "approval", "value_justification": "The speaker wants to limit AI's role to 'copiloting' and ensure students are in control of the writing process, emphasizing human autonomy.", "target_justification": "The target of the alignment is individual users, specifically students, as the speaker discusses ways to assess and ensure their honest work." } ```