Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Alvin Foo yes I also believe the future is agentic, but right now it is unsustainable. Compute costs are really high, and this is more a structural problem. Having 93+ agents running in parallel without a concern of how many tokens they are going to use is not an efficient approach at all. Ang Google really messed things up forcing its developer community to use antigravity 2.0, without any previous notice and developers just need the tools to build their agentic workflows, not a final product with a huge ticket price.
LinkedIn AI Research & Models Mechanical engineer building Python automations… 2026-05-24T14:5…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Primary valuesustainability
Secondary valuenone
Alignment targetindividual_users
Stancecritical
Emotionoutrage
Value justificationThe speaker expresses concern about the high compute costs and inefficient approach of running multiple agents in parallel, indicating a desire for sustainable AI practices.
Target justificationThe speaker appears to be advocating for the needs and concerns of individual developers, who are being forced to adapt to new tools and workflows without sufficient support or consideration.
Coded at2026-06-11T08:04:32Z
Raw LLM Response
``` { "value_primary": "sustainability", "value_secondary": "none", "target": "individual_users", "stance": "critical", "emotion": "outrage", "value_justification": "The speaker expresses concern about the high compute costs and inefficient approach of running multiple agents in parallel, indicating a desire for sustainable AI practices.", "target_justification": "The speaker appears to be advocating for the needs and concerns of individual developers, who are being forced to adapt to new tools and workflows without sufficient support or consideration." } ```