Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
The control problem is the part that keeps getting underweighted in these conver…
7468697880745…
in
This is not just digital transformation anymore — it’s institutional transformat…
7465093117613…
in
I fundamentally believe that AI cannot drive the growth companies expect by remo…
7465051667525…
in
Clara Hawking- " But more importantly, it frames schools not merely as places of…
7465015260937…
in
A really important perspective on how AI is changing the value of work rather th…
7466149909025…
in
What is happening right now is historically unprecedented: Religious institution…
7465453158098…
in
Honestly, the part that stood out to me wasn’t how much energy a single AI query…
7468632676229…
in
Dan Martell This is very underrated advice for AI tools almost nobody talks abou…
7464795085214…
Comment
Though the approach is great but if you follow the reviews, antigravity 2.0 is quite the disaster both in terms of quality and pricing. It’s really hard to digest the company which is on the frontlines of software engineering talent can’t make a half decent coding product. Even the Gemini 3.5 flash is sub par. Google’s search strength is unmatched which will serve most consumers or users who mostly prompt once, but it will lose users who are into chain of thought searches as they will find ChatGPT and Claude way superior. I’m really rooting for Google though as they have the talent and the control over the full supply chain of ai to provide quality at really competitive prices.
LinkedIn
AI Research & Models
Strategy Professional| Retail & Consumer focus|…
2026-05-23T23:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | unclear |
| Secondary value | fairness |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | critical |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Value justification | The speaker wants AI products to have high quality, as evidenced by their criticism of Anti-gravity 2.0's poor quality. |
| Target justification | The speaker is concerned about the quality of AI products for individual users, such as consumers who use Google's search or coding products. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:03:16Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "quality",
"value_secondary": "fairness",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "critical",
"emotion": "disapproval",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants AI products to have high quality, as evidenced by their criticism of Anti-gravity 2.0's poor quality.",
"target_justification": "The speaker is concerned about the quality of AI products for individual users, such as consumers who use Google's search or coding products."
}
```