Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
Pope Leo XIV's encyclical "Magnifica Humanitas" just gave a moral megaphone to t…
7466126549470…
in
While there's some general wisdom in Pope Leo's AI encyclical, it also completel…
7465619827131…
in
Luís Rodrigues This is a useful simplification because many organisations still …
7464689678596…
in
Fascinating glimpse into AI's accelerating capabilities and the crucial need for…
7468678138588…
in
Honestly the SynthID news is the one I'd underline twice, Demis. Watermarking is…
7468755592677…
in
Paul Crinigan I didn't Experiance that, AI developed my autonomous crypto tradin…
7468792881260…
in
Demis, regarding this I/O update and the push for "agentic" routing: your new ha…
7466328706416…
in
Sheshadri Bhattacharyya I’m rooting for Google too. The vision is right, AI orch…
7464322030213…
Comment
I looked at the comments section here to check how many people tolerate and appreciate being told what to do and how to do it without experimentation and data about real results. And I’ll say this again: Ai doesn’t belong on LinkedIn. 90% of automation connection with the LinkedIn app is being either PUNISHED by the algorithm or BANNING accounts. If not today, then “tomorrow”. Not to mention Ai is thinking for all of us, based on everything it learned about each one of us. And it is using average fractions of the internet. If you saw who was feeding Ai you wouldn’t use it for a shortcut
LinkedIn
AI Research & Models
0% fluff 100% marketing
2026-04-22T01:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | human_autonomy |
| Secondary value | none |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | critical |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Value justification | The speaker values human autonomy because they express concern that AI is thinking for people and making decisions without their input or experimentation. |
| Target justification | The target of the speaker's concern is individual users, as they mention people being told what to do and having their accounts banned or punished by the algorithm. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T07:54:37Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "human_autonomy",
"value_secondary": "none",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "critical",
"emotion": "outrage",
"value_justification": "The speaker values human autonomy because they express concern that AI is thinking for people and making decisions without their input or experimentation.",
"target_justification": "The target of the speaker's concern is individual users, as they mention people being told what to do and having their accounts banned or punished by the algorithm."
}
```